Five things your auditor wishes every charity trustee would ask
Trustees’ Week celebrates the contribution trustees make to charities across the UK, and it is also a good moment to reflect on what effective trusteeship looks like in practice. Trustees do not need to be accountants, lawyers, investment specialists or experts in every aspect of the organisation they govern. Indeed, one of the strengths of a successful trustee board is often the diversity of experience and perspective around the table.
What trustees do need is curiosity.
The Charity Commission is clear that responsibility for the governance of a charity ultimately sits with its trustee board. Its guidance covers everything from having the right people and skills on the board to appropriate decision-making, risk management and internal financial controls.
As auditors working with charities of different sizes and complexities, we see first-hand the difference that constructive challenge can make. Often, the most valuable contribution a trustee can make isn’t knowing the answer but asking the question that encourages everyone around the table to stop, think and challenge an assumption.
Here are five questions we think every trustee should be asking.
“What could seriously derail our strategy?”
Risk registers are a familiar part of charity governance, but the more important question, is whether the risks on the register genuinely reflect the things that could prevent the charity from achieving its objectives. The Charity Commission’s risk management guidance was updated in September 2026, reinforcing the importance of trustees understanding and managing the risks their charity faces.
A useful board conversation therefore goes further than asking whether the risk register has been updated. What happens if a major funder withdraws? What if unrestricted income falls significantly? What if demand for services increases at the same time as costs? What would a cyber incident mean for service delivery? Are there regulatory, safeguarding or reputational risks capable of changing the charity’s position very quickly?
Most importantly, trustees should consider whether the mitigations recorded against significant risks would actually work if they were needed tomorrow.
“How financially resilient are we, really?”
A healthy bank balance does not necessarily mean that a charity has significant financial headroom. Some of that cash may represent restricted funds, some may already be committed to future activity, and property and other fixed assets may make reserves look substantial without providing the cash to meet next month’s salaries. Trustees should therefore understand the story behind the headline numbers.
That means asking: What are our genuinely available free reserves? How many months of expenditure do those reserves represent? How concentrated are our income streams? How sensitive is our forecast to changes in income, salaries or other costs? How much unrestricted cash do we expect to have in six or 12 months? What action would we take if the downside scenario actually happened?
This is also where the reserves policy becomes important. A good reserves policy shouldn’t simply justify the year-end reserves figure. It should explain why the charity needs the level of reserves it holds, how that level has been determined and what trustees would do if reserves moved materially above or below it.
“Are we too dependent on one source of income?”
Income concentration isn’t necessarily a problem. A charity can have a long-standing funding relationship that provides considerable stability, but trustees need to understand the consequences if that relationship changes.
For grant-funded charities, that could mean understanding future funding settlements, whether grants are restricted, the conditions attached to funding and the point at which income can be recognised. For charities with fundraising income, it could mean understanding donor retention and the return generated by different fundraising activities. For organisations with trading subsidiaries, memberships, contracts or commercial operations, trustees should understand both the opportunities and the risks those activities bring. The aim is not diversification for its own sake, but understanding where the charity is exposed and whether the board is comfortable with that exposure.
A particularly powerful question is:
“If our largest source of income disappeared tomorrow, what would we do?”
If nobody around the board table is quite sure of the answer, that is probably a conversation worth having.
“Are we getting the information we need to make good decisions?”
One of the easiest measures of a board pack is its length, and one of the hardest is whether it actually tells trustees what they need to know. Twenty pages of financial information can still leave a trustee unable to answer a relatively straightforward question: are we performing better or worse than expected, and why?
Good management information should allow trustees to see the relationship between:
strategy → activity → performance → finance → risk → impact.
For financial information, that might mean reporting actual results against budget, explaining significant variances, looking forward through forecasts and cash flows, and distinguishing between unrestricted and restricted resources. For non-financial information, it could mean measures of service delivery, fundraising performance, beneficiary outcomes, staff turnover or other KPIs specific to the charity’s objectives.
Trustees should feel able to challenge information they don’t understand. An unexplained variance, an unexpected movement or a KPI that consistently doesn’t quite make sense deserves another question.
“Are we ready for the digital revolution?’
Artificial intelligence (AI) is developing quickly, and for many charities the question is no longer whether it will affect them, but how. AI may already be being used by staff to draft documents, analyse information, communicate with supporters or speed up everyday tasks, sometimes without trustees being aware of it, which creates opportunities as well as new risks.
Trustees don’t need to become AI or cybersecurity experts. They do, however, need to understand how technology is being used and ask whether the organisation has appropriate controls around it. What information are staff putting into AI tools? Could that include personal, confidential or sensitive information? Who checks that AI-generated information is accurate? Could bias or an incorrect answer affect beneficiaries or decision-making? Do staff understand what they can and cannot use these tools for?
The same applies to cybersecurity. What would happen if the charity’s systems were unavailable tomorrow? Could it continue delivering services? How quickly could it recover? Who would make the key decisions? And when did the organisation last test whether its response plan actually works?
This should not only be a conversation about risk. Trustees should also be asking what opportunities technology creates, and whether AI could reduce administration, improve efficiency, strengthen fundraising or allow more resources to be directed towards beneficiaries?
Perhaps the most useful question is:
“Are we consciously deciding how technology and AI should be used in our charity, or are we simply allowing it to happen?”
Good trustees don’t need to have all the answers
Trustees remain responsible for the decisions they make, but that does not mean they are expected to have all the necessary specialist expertise themselves. Charity Commission guidance requires trustees to ensure they are sufficiently informed when making decisions and expressly recognises the need to obtain professional advice where appropriate, for example where trustees are uncertain about their legal powers. Taking appropriate professional advice can therefore form part of trustees exercising reasonable care and skill and reaching a properly informed decision.
This Trustees’ Week, we would encourage trustee boards to make space for curiosity. One of the most valuable things a trustee can bring to the boardroom isn’t always the answer. Sometimes, it’s the question nobody else has asked.
At your next board meeting, consider choosing one of these five questions and setting aside ten minutes to discuss it without reference to the usual board papers. The resulting conversation may be more valuable than simply adding another report to the pack.
We always recommend that you seek advice from a suitably qualified adviser before taking any action. The information on this page is intended as a general guide only. While we work to keep our content accurate and up to date, we cannot guarantee that it reflects the position at the time you are reading it. No responsibility for loss occasioned by any person acting or refraining from action as a result of this material can be accepted by the authors or the firm. For more information on our editorial process, click here.
Have a question for our Charities team? Contact us below...
Sign up to receive exclusive business insights
Join our community of industry leaders and receive exclusive reports, early event access, and expert advice to stay ahead – all delivered straight to your inbox.
We can help
Contact us today to find out more about how we can help you