Valuing a technology company for fundraising: The ten factors that set your number
Cambridge Tech Week got underway yesterday, and Price Bailey is proud to be sponsoring the event as it runs through to 18 September. To mark it, Chand Chudasama sets out how a tech company is valued when it raises money for growth, and where founders lose value without realising it.
Valuing an early-stage business for funding requires both skill and judgement. That is why two questions arise in every fundraise: what is my company worth, and what affects that figure?
Below are the ten factors that influence that answer.
1. Key concepts: why a fundraise valuation is different today
As opposed to a sale valuation, fundraising valuations typically have more ‘hope value’. Cash goes into the business rather than out to selling shareholders, the number of shares increases, shareholders’ rights often get amended and Board and equity level adjusts.
Investors are usually more bullish, and more willing to back an ambitious growth plan compared to a buyer in a conventional sale, because they have more influence over what happens to their money once it’s inside the business.
This influence also shapes how an investment is structured. Pre-money and post-money valuations show how the new investment affects ownership, while founders must also agree how issued and planned options or growth shares will dilute both existing shareholders and the prospective investor.
Additionally, founders should be aware of how the equity funding market has changed in 2026 and 2027 compared to prior years. Venture Capital investors are carrying disproportionate levels of failed investments from those made between 2019 and 2023. These are denting returns and appetite to make more venture investments.
As a result, investors are placing greater emphasis on financial and commercial fundamentals: smaller businesses should ideally meet the Rule of 40, where their revenue growth rate and EBIT margin add up to at least 40 percent.
2. The team
The team an investor is buying into is one of the biggest determinants of the valuation they are willing to pay. A venture investor needs to believe the business can grow far beyond where it is today, which means the team typically must include:
- A visionary leader who can see beyond where the industry is today and move the business toward where it is going.
- Someone who can open doors with new customers and someone who can close them. These are often different skills, and sometimes different people, particularly in regulated sectors such as finance, food, or selling into a supermarket, where the character who opens the door is rarely patient or detailed enough to close it.
- Someone who can build the product, whether that is a strong Chief Technology Officer or a product designer.
- Someone in operations who joins the other pieces together.
Ideally, at least half of the team has done this before at scale and ideally made someone else money along the way. A common weak spot is when the right people have been identified but are not yet in the business. Promising to join after the raise is fine in principle, but it depresses the valuation rather than creating value, and a team that knows the theory but has never done it in practice is a similar concern.
3. Product market fit
Achieving a premium valuation for a high-growth or early-stage business depends on the founder’s ability to demonstrate product market fit: meaning the business cannot build or supply fast enough to keep up with demand. For a product company, this would look like selling out every short production run before it can even promote the next one; for a software company, this could look like the inability to hire customer success managers quickly enough to keep up with demand.
Overall, product market fit means selling the right product or service to the right customer group, at the right time, through the right medium, and at the right price. Plenty of investors will fund a business that has not yet reached that point, but founders in that position cannot expect a premium valuation, and they lose a significant amount of negotiating power as a result.
4. Industry dynamics: the best owner principle
Industry dynamics ask what other sellers in the market do, and how easily they can deploy capital to compete. Some industries are stagnant and ripe for disruption, while others are already hyper dynamic and constantly innovating.
This is where the best owner principle comes in. The question is not just whether a product or idea works, but who is best placed to own it. If the answer is a disruptive business with no legacy ties or inefficiency, that is a strong position. If an established player could replicate it quickly with better access to data and a bigger sales operation, investors become nervous. It does not necessarily stop them investing, but it depresses the valuation, because the best owner might already be someone else.
5. Buyer dynamics: market size and niches
Where industry dynamics look at the sellers, buyer dynamics look at the buyers. Investors in a high-growth business want to see a large market that is also full of niches they can understand individually, rather than one big, undifferentiated opportunity.
For example: A business fits tyres at people’s homes via an online booking system. The overall tyre market is huge, but the founders identify specific sub-sectors within it: lease hire cars, nearly new 4x4s needing premium tyres, and older convertibles needing a seasonal changeover between summer and winter tyres. Three very different campaigns target three specific niches, each with its own route to product market fit, and other sub-sectors will follow once these three are won.
The strongest negotiating position is often when an investor says they have never even heard of a particular sub-market and cannot believe how much revenue sits inside it. That reaction signals a team that knows its market in real depth, with a credible route to product market fit. If a well-informed investor has never heard of the niche, the odds are that competitors have not found it either.
6. Risk to value: who the investor is, and the risk-free rate
The most common investor pools include:
- Venture capital funds
- Venture capital trusts
- Angels and angel networks
- Corporate venture capital
- Family offices and private equity funds
These groups each have different expectations of how and when they make money, but most generally want their capital out within three to five years through a capital payment on exit, as opposed to income along the way. Two factors outside the management team’s control then shape how an investor prices that risk:
Volatility: Some sectors see very stable EBITDA and revenue multiples on sale, and others see a lot of fluctuation. Technology sold into utilities tends to be stable, because utilities companies themselves are stable, while technology sold into marketing agencies tends to be volatile, because marketing agencies are volatile. The management team has done nothing wrong in either case, but an investor pricing in a possible trough at the point they need to exit will push today’s valuation down to protect themselves.
Risk-free rate: This is often one that founders underestimate. UK and US government bonds are currently paying in excess of 5 percent over 10 to 30 years. When an investor’s investor can get most of that return risk-free, capital tends to flow toward the safe option, which pushes down the valuation offered on venture deals. The main exception to this is ultra-high net worth angels who can be less sensitive to the risk-free rate than funds with fiduciary obligations who are investing other people’s money.
7. What the business looks like at scale: the financial model
A financial model provides a numerical articulation of what the business will look like at scale. Entrepreneurs typically underestimate the cost of running the business and the working capital needed to build it. A finance director tends to build a more prudent model, but investors also want to see the visionary’s ambition, and hypergrowth businesses often outgrow their finance directors, along with their salespeople, faster than any other role in the team. For a venture capital investment of £2.5 million or more, where the investor is placing someone else’s money, expect the model to face serious scrutiny before completion.
Founders should expect a VCT or similar to spend £20,000 to £30,000 with a Financial Due Diligence provider to break their model, which might mean more is being spent on testing the model than building it.
8. How options and growth shares work
Investors typically invest on a fully diluted basis, which means the management team has to think upfront about how large an options pool it wants to set aside for staff and other directors, often as much as 20 percent of the share capital. It is rare for the incoming investor to be diluted by that pool, and in practice, it almost always dilutes the shareholders who already held shares before the fundraise.
Management teams and early angels often forget this and are then frustrated to find they carry the future dilution alone, even though the resulting incentives create value for everyone. It is worth asking directly whether a headline, fully diluted valuation understates how much of that value the existing shareholders keep.
9. Deal terms
Price Bailey has advised on fundraises with an average success rate of more than 80 percent, and one thing remains consistently true: investors value the words written in an agreement, not the numbers, and inexperienced founders value the numbers. Founders driven by their pre-money price often fixate on that number and overlook the terms, even though it’s the terms that decide how the business is run once the money is in.
Terms such as preference equity, or preference-like rights wrapped up as ordinary shares, lever provisions, drag and tag rights, consent rights, and penalty dividends all give real value to an investor, and feed directly into how they arrive at a valuation. Founders live with these clauses when things go well and when things go wrong. They do not live with a headline percentage
10. Money multiple return
Money multiple return, often shortened to MMR, is simple in concept: for every pound an investor puts in, how many pounds do they expect to get out. It helps to separate economically rational investors, who are investing someone else’s money and expect a specific return, from economically irrational investors such as friends and family, who back the person rather than the numbers.
Price Bailey’s guidelines for reasonable returns to economically rational investors are as follows:
- Angels should typically seek 7 times to 15 times returns, while aiming for 50 times or more, and recognising that rare outliers can deliver returns of 100 times or higher.
- Venture capital funds and venture capital trusts usually present investment committees with a downside case of 3 times, while really targeting 5 times to 10 times depending on where their capital comes from.
- Private equity funds typically model a downside case of two and a half times and are very happy achieving 5 times or more.
A founder can inflate the money multiple return simply by pushing up the assumed exit valuation, which is why the exit multiple must be realistic and benchmarked against genuinely comparable trade sales on revenue or EBITDA terms. This connects directly to point six: the same volatility and risk-free rate pressures that shape today’s valuation also shape what a credible exit multiple looks like.
Bringing it together
These ten factors do not operate in isolation. A strong team and clear product market fit can offset difficult industry dynamics; a realistic financial model can offset a cautious risk-free rate environment. But every one of them feeds into the number a founder sees on a term sheet, and the deal terms decide how much of that number the founder actually keeps.
If you are fundraising, or planning to raise in the next few years, Price Bailey’s Technology and SCF team can help you build the case before you are in a room with an investor. Get in touch with Chand Chudasama or the wider technology team at Price Bailey to talk through where your business stands against these ten factors.
We always recommend that you seek advice from a suitably qualified adviser before taking any action. The information on this page is intended as a general guide only. While we work to keep our content accurate and up to date, we cannot guarantee that it reflects the position at the time you are reading it. No responsibility for loss occasioned by any person acting or refraining from action as a result of this material can be accepted by the authors or the firm. For more information on our editorial process, click here.
Sign up to receive exclusive business insights
Join our community of industry leaders and receive exclusive reports, early event access, and expert advice to stay ahead – all delivered straight to your inbox.