LLP or Limited Company: How architects and surveyors can structure their practice for efficiency, resilience and growth

Architects and surveyors prize precision above all else. When even the smallest miscalculation can compromise a structure or delay a project, attention to detail is everything. But when it comes to choosing a legal vehicle for their practice, many stick to tradition rather than examine the fine print.

Whether you’re a boutique architecture studio or a national surveying firm, how you operate can shape your firm’s reputation and reward. The choice often narrows to two models: the limited liability partnership (LLP) and the limited company. Each offers its own balance of protection, flexibility and fiscal nuance.

In this article, we explore the advantages of each structure. We’ll also offer practical advice for architects and surveyors looking to strengthen their business through the right legal foundation.

The case for an LLP

We were one of the first accountancy firms to take on limited liability status, and started trading as a limited liability partnership (LLP) from 1 April 2004. Since then, we’ve guided scores of professional outfits through the transition. This has given us a unique perspective on the structural, strategic and financial benefits that LLP status can bring to firms operating in complex, project-based environments.

By merging the limited liability safeguard long enjoyed by corporations with the familiar partnership ethos, an LLP addresses two perennial concerns: shielding personal assets and preserving organisational fluidity. Partners remain taxed as individuals on share of profits rather than as corporate entities.

As a result, you benefit from limited liability, meaning your personal exposure is capped and only extends to the assets you’ve committed. Meanwhile, you retain the flexibility to customise profit-sharing, capital contributions, and exit strategies to suit your needs.

For firms engaged in design or surveying, the ability to secure financing against outstanding invoices is especially helpful. Many banks view LLPs more favourably than traditional partnerships, recognising the statutory transparency such structures demand. At the same time, you retain the freedom to establish trading subsidiaries. This can be useful if you’re thinking about spinning out a surveying arm, launching a technology venture or placing intellectual property in a separate vehicle.

Why a limited company may suit you better

Limited companies, on the other hand, come with their own cachet. In a sector where reputation underpins every tender, the label “Limited” can suggest scale and solidity to clients and lenders. Companies also open doors to dividend‑based distributions, which can be more efficient than salaries when tax rates favour shareholder income over earned income.

Company directors can also more easily access approved pension schemes, making a corporate structure particularly appealing for practices looking to grow beyond a small group of senior owners or attract external investment.

Crucially, limited companies operate under corporate tax rules rather than partnership tax rules. At current rates, corporation tax may prove lower than higher‑rate personal income tax, meaning more cash stays within the business which can be reinvested for future growth.

Key considerations for architects and surveyors in choosing the right legal structure

No two practices are identical; each has its own unique set of priorities. But it’s important to always take certain considerations into account when choosing a legal structure, particularly around liability, tax efficiency and long-term growth.

Profit‑sharing versus control

Architects often prefer a system that rewards individual contribution, whether based on billable hours, project leadership or origination fees. An LLP allows bespoke sharing formulas; a company typically relies on share ownership and dividend policies. Choose the model that best reflects how you want to recognise effort and incentivise performance.

Liability exposure

The financial stakes are often high for architects and surveyors, particularly when landmark projects run over budget or defect claims surface years after completion. LLPs limit liability at partner level, whereas companies insulate shareholders but can expose directors to penalty for breaches of duty. Review your risk profile carefully, making sure your chosen structure aligns with your exposure.

Succession planning

The transfer of equity in a partnership requires consent from existing partners and can trigger tax charges on goodwill. Transmitting company shares is often simpler, but stamp duty and capital gains tax still apply. If succession is on the horizon, plan early to avoid disruption and unnecessary tax costs.

Banking and bonding

Lenders and surety providers will assess the strength of your balance sheet, the contractual terms with clients and the personal guarantees on offer. Some will prefer the transparency that comes with a corporate structure, while others will value the joint‑and‑several commitments of partners. Speak to your bank or bond provider before committing, because preferences vary and could affect access to finance.

The conversion maze

Transforming your business isn’t just a case of swapping letterheads. Engagement letters must be redrafted to reflect the new entity. Profit‑allocation clauses will demand fresh scrutiny. Contracts with clients, landlords and suppliers will all need fresh signatures. And tax elections (especially for transfer of assets on incorporation) must be crystallised within narrow deadlines to avoid unwelcome charges.

We support practices through each critical stage: from initial feasibility and modelling of cash flows, through to legal documentation and regulatory filings and post‑conversion tax and accounting. Our aim is to minimise disruption, so partners can carry on designing or surveying, confident that the back‑office details have been tailored to their objectives.

Making the right call for your practice

No structure can eliminate risk or replace sound management, but the right choice of entity can sharpen your competitive edge. Are you seeking to lock in a long‑term capital plan, with dividends and robust governance? A limited company may serve you best. Do you prioritise the partnership dynamic, with bespoke profit‑sharing and flexible exits? An LLP could be the natural home.

Whichever path you choose, make sure you engage advisors who understand your sector’s unique mix of creativity, regulation and project risk. With thoughtful planning, you can structure your practice to maximise protection, efficiency and long-term flexibility. In doing so, you’ll free up valuable time to focus on what matters most: shaping safer, more sustainable and better-designed buildings and environments.

We always recommend that you seek advice from a suitably qualified adviser before taking any action. The information in this article only serves as a guide and no responsibility for loss occasioned by any person acting or refraining from action as a result of this material can be accepted by the authors or the firm.

Sign up to receive exclusive business insights

Join our community of industry leaders and receive exclusive reports, early event access, and expert advice to stay ahead – all delivered straight to your inbox.